Introduction
Restructuring compensation runs at the top of the investment banking market, particularly at the elite boutique firms (PJT, Evercore, Centerview, Moelis) that dominate the space. The compensation structure (base salary plus discretionary bonus, scaling with seniority and individual performance) follows broader IB norms, but the absolute levels skew higher than at bulge brackets and the bonus dispersion within firms can be substantial.
This article walks through:
- compensation by seniority level across the major Rx firms
- the boutique premium versus bulge brackets
- how Rx compensation compares to other IB segments at peer banks
Year 1 Analyst Compensation
The headline number for first-year (A1) analysts at the major Rx firms in 2025 is approximately $200-$270K all-in, with the top firms (Evercore, Centerview, Moelis, PJT) paying toward the upper end of that range.
| Firm | Base Salary (Y1) | Year-End Bonus (Y1) | All-In (Y1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PJT Partners RSSG | $110-$120K | $110-$140K | $220-$260K |
| Houlihan Lokey FR | $110-$115K | $80-$110K | $190-$225K |
| Evercore Restructuring | $110-$120K | $130-$150K | $240-$270K |
| Lazard Restructuring | $110-$115K | $95-$130K | $205-$245K |
| Moelis Restructuring | $110-$120K | $110-$140K | $220-$260K |
| Centerview (selective Rx) | $120-$130K | $140-$170K | $260-$300K |
| Bulge bracket M&A (comparison) | $110-$120K | $60-$90K | $170-$210K |
The dispersion across firms is meaningful but not extreme. The roughly $50-$80K gap between the top elite boutiques and the bulge brackets at A1 represents the "boutique premium" that has been a feature of the IB compensation landscape since the late 2010s. The premium has narrowed somewhat as bulge brackets have raised junior compensation, but a meaningful gap persists.
Compensation Progression Across Seniority
Compensation grows substantially across analyst, associate, VP, and MD ranks. The progression is roughly comparable across the major Rx firms, with similar pay levels at each title for similar performance.
| Title | Years | Base | Bonus | All-In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst Y1 | 0-1 | $110-$130K | $80-$170K | $190-$300K |
| Analyst Y2 | 1-2 | $125-$140K | $110-$180K | $235-$320K |
| Analyst Y3 | 2-3 | $140-$160K | $130-$210K | $270-$370K |
| Associate | 3-6 | $175-$250K | $100-$250K | $275-$500K |
| Vice President | 6-9 | $250-$350K | $250-$350K | $500-$700K |
| Director / SVP | 9-12 | $350-$500K | $350-$700K | $700K-$1.2M |
| Managing Director | 12+ | $400-$600K | $400-$1M+ | $800K-$1.5M+ |
A few patterns are worth noting:
- Bonus dispersion grows with seniority. Analyst bonuses run within a roughly $60-$90K band across performance buckets at a given firm. By the MD level, the bonus dispersion can be $500K+ between top and average performers, reflecting individual mandate origination and performance.
- Top-bucket analysts earn substantial premiums. A top-bucket Y2 analyst in a high-revenue Rx group can earn $30-$50K more than a middle-bucket analyst at the same firm in a slower group. The dispersion is similar at A3 and Associate levels.
- MD compensation is highly variable. Top-performing Rx MDs (those originating multiple $10M+ mandates per year) can earn $3-5M+ total compensation. Average MDs earn the $800K-$1.5M range. The dispersion reflects the production-driven nature of senior IB compensation.
The Boutique Premium
The "boutique premium" describes the consistent gap between elite boutique IB compensation and bulge bracket compensation, particularly at junior levels. The premium runs roughly 20-40% at A1 and Associate levels, with the gap narrowing somewhat at MD and Partner ranks (where bulge bracket MDs at high-fee groups can match or exceed boutique compensation).
The drivers of the boutique premium:
- Higher revenue per banker. Elite boutiques typically generate $2-3 million in revenue per banker, versus $1-2 million at bulge brackets. The higher productivity supports higher compensation pools.
- Lower fixed costs. Boutiques carry less overhead (no balance sheet trading desks, smaller back-office, no commercial banking infrastructure) and can return more revenue to bankers as compensation.
- Performance-based culture. Boutique partners have stronger incentives to maximize bonus pools, particularly at firms where senior bankers have meaningful equity ownership (PJT, Moelis, Centerview, PWP).
Rx Versus M&A at the Same Firm
A common question is whether Rx pays more, the same, or less than M&A at the same firm. The answer varies modestly:
- At pure-play Rx boutiques (Houlihan Lokey FR, PJT RSSG): Compensation is set firm-wide with little distinction between Rx and other groups. The Rx work is the dominant or co-dominant business.
- At firms with meaningful M&A and Rx practices (Evercore, Lazard, Moelis): Rx compensation generally tracks M&A compensation at the same level, with bonus pools sometimes biased toward whichever practice had stronger fee performance in a given year. In 2024-2025, Rx fee growth often exceeded M&A growth, modestly tilting bonus pools.
- At bulge brackets with smaller Rx practices: Rx compensation typically tracks the broader M&A coverage compensation grid. Bulge bracket Rx is rarely a meaningful pay differentiator.
Geographic and Sector Variation
Compensation varies modestly by geography and sector at the major Rx firms.
Geographic variation. New York and San Francisco offices typically pay slightly higher base salaries than Chicago, Atlanta, or Dallas offices, reflecting cost-of-living differences. Bonuses are generally consistent across geographies for similar performance, though some firms moderately adjust bonus pools by city.
Sector variation. Some Rx specializations (particularly healthcare and financial institutions) command modest compensation premiums at firms with deep sector benches. The premium is typically 5-10% rather than dramatic, but it exists.
Bonus Mechanics: How Year-End Compensation Actually Works
Understanding how bonuses are determined is critical for candidates evaluating compensation. The mechanics differ in important ways from the simpler salary structures common in other industries:
- Bonus pool determination. Each firm sets an aggregate bonus pool at year-end based on firm-wide revenue and profitability. The pool is then allocated across groups, with stronger-performing groups receiving larger allocations. Within a group, the pool is allocated across performance buckets.
- Performance buckets. Most Rx firms divide analysts into roughly four buckets: top, top-mid, middle, and bottom. The bucket determines the analyst's individual bonus, with top-bucket bonuses running 20-40% above middle-bucket bonuses for the same title and tenure.
- Calendar-year versus fiscal-year cycles. Some firms have shifted from the traditional July-to-July fiscal year to calendar-year bonus cycles, resetting payout timing. The shift affects how mid-year joiners are compensated and how bonus expectations align with the financial year. Candidates evaluating multiple offers should clarify which cycle each firm uses.
- Stub bonuses. Mid-year joiners (typically those who started in the summer after junior year and joined full-time after graduation) often receive a "stub bonus" representing prorated payment for the partial year. Stub bonus levels vary widely; some firms pay generous stubs, others pay minimal amounts.
| Bonus Component | Determination Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Firm-wide pool | Set by management based on annual revenue/profitability |
| Group allocation | Based on group-level fee generation versus targets |
| Performance bucket | Manager evaluations across staffing, work product, professionalism |
| Individual amount | Combination of group allocation and bucket placement |
| Sign-on bonus | One-time payment at start, typically $10-$25K |
| Stub bonus | Prorated payment for partial-year service |
Recent Trends: 2024-2025 Compensation Surge
The 2024-2025 Rx fee surge translated directly into higher bonus pools at the major firms. Industry tracking suggests that 2024 year-end bonuses (paid early 2025) ran 15-25% above 2023 levels at most major Rx firms, reflecting the strong fee year. The 2025 fee year, which ran an estimated 30-40% above 2024 levels, will likely produce another step-up in early 2026 bonus payments.
For candidates entering the market in 2025-2026, the compensation environment is among the most attractive Rx market windows in recent memory. Junior compensation at the top firms is likely to remain elevated through the next bonus cycle even if fee growth moderates. The key question is whether the cycle continues into 2027 or normalizes back to lower levels as default rates ease and the maturity wall pulls forward refinancing activity.
What Compensation Tells Us About Career Choice
For candidates evaluating Rx versus other IB paths or other careers, compensation is one input but not the dominant one. The relative compensation across paths is roughly:
| Path | A1 All-In Range |
|---|---|
| Rx elite boutique | $220-$280K |
| M&A elite boutique | $220-$280K |
| Rx bulge bracket | $190-$220K |
| M&A bulge bracket | $170-$210K |
| Distressed credit hedge fund (analyst) | $200-$300K (variable bonus) |
| Distressed PE / special sits | $180-$250K |
| Restructuring consulting (FTI, AlixPartners) | $110-$160K |
The compensation differences within Wall Street paths are modest enough that career choice should be driven by interest, skills development, and long-term trajectory rather than first-year compensation. The bigger compensation step-up generally comes at the buy-side exit (distressed hedge funds and PE often pay $300K-$600K+ in the second year post-banking) rather than within the IB analyst program itself.
The next ten articles in this section drill into the exit pathways, interview process, and technical preparation that ultimately determine where Rx careers lead.


