Introduction
Most sophisticated Chapter 11 cases are won or lost before the petition is filed. The months of pre-filing preparation that precede a high-quality bankruptcy filing produce three deliverables that together determine the case's trajectory: a restructuring support agreement (RSA) signed by enough creditors to deliver plan-confirmation votes, a debtor-in-possession (DIP) facility committed and ready for first-day approval, and a comprehensive first-day motion package that lets the company continue operating without disruption from the moment the automatic stay attaches. The strongest cases enter court with all three already locked down; the weakest free-fall filings enter court with none of them.
The work behind these deliverables is intense and largely invisible from outside. The advisor team divides the workload:
- RX banks (Houlihan Lokey, PJT, Evercore, Lazard, Moelis on the largest cases) lead the strategic process
- Counsel (Kirkland, Weil, Davis Polk, Latham, Paul Weiss) drafts the documentation
- Financial advisors (AlixPartners, Alvarez & Marsal, FTI, Deloitte) build the operating model and the 13-week cash flow
- Inside the company, the chief restructuring officer (often a senior partner from a turnaround firm) coordinates with the management team and the board
On the creditor side, ad hoc groups form and retain their own RX bank and counsel; the secured-lender steering committee organizes; potential DIP lenders run diligence; minority creditors decide whether to coordinate defensively. The pre-filing phase is the negotiation phase, and the resulting deal terms get baked into the case at filing.
This article walks through the three pre-filing workstreams (RSA negotiation, DIP shopping, stakeholder outreach), the documentation that gets produced, the timing and sequencing across the workstreams, the dual-track contingency planning that runs in parallel with an out-of-court alternative, and the recent precedents (CURO, Enviva, Mallinckrodt, Wolfspeed) that illustrate how the work plays out in practice.
What Pre-Filing Preparation Actually Covers
Pre-filing preparation is the comprehensive set of legal, financial, and stakeholder work that occurs in the weeks or months before a Chapter 11 petition is filed. The defining characteristic is that the work happens outside court supervision: there is no automatic stay, no judge, no U.S. Trustee, and no procedural deadlines other than those the parties impose on themselves. The negotiating leverage and information asymmetries that exist before filing are very different from those that exist after, which is why so much of the strategic work concentrates in this phase.
- Pre-Filing Preparation (Pre-Petition Work)
The pre-petition phase of a Chapter 11 case during which the debtor, working with its RX bank and counsel, negotiates terms with key stakeholders, sources DIP financing, drafts the petition and first-day motion package, and coordinates the dual-track contingency planning between an out-of-court restructuring alternative (LMT, DEO, debt-for-equity swap) and an in-court Chapter 11 backstop. The phase typically runs 3-9 months for prepackaged or pre-arranged cases and a few weeks for emergency free-fall filings. The principal deliverables are an executed restructuring support agreement (RSA), committed DIP financing, a Day-1-ready first-day motion package, and creditor coalitions sufficient to deliver plan confirmation votes once the case is filed.
The phase typically begins when the company's board concludes that some form of restructuring is needed and authorizes the engagement of an RX bank and bankruptcy counsel. The early weeks focus on diagnostic work: capital structure review, 13-week cash flow modeling, contract analysis, valuation, and identification of the specific maturity, covenant, or liquidity triggers driving the restructuring. The middle weeks shift to strategic work: negotiating with major creditor classes, shopping the DIP, drafting the petition documentation, and conducting outreach to other stakeholders. The final weeks focus on closing: executing the RSA, finalizing the DIP commitment, completing the first-day motions, and choosing the filing date.
The Pre-Filing Sequence
A typical sophisticated pre-filing process runs through a defined sequence over 12-26 weeks.
Diagnostic and CRO retention (Weeks 1-4)
Board engages RX bank, bankruptcy counsel, and turnaround firm. A Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) is often appointed (typically a senior partner from AlixPartners, Alvarez & Marsal, FTI Consulting, Berkeley Research Group, or M3 Partners) with broad authority to oversee restructuring decisions. The CRO completes a 13-week cash flow forecast, develops profit-improvement initiatives, and coordinates stakeholder communication. AlixPartners pioneered the CRO role and the incentive-based success fee structure that has become industry standard.
Capital structure and contract review (Weeks 2-6)
The RX bank and FA build the comprehensive pro forma capital structure analysis, identify the key creditor classes and their economic positions, review every material contract and lease, and develop the 5-year financial projection that will support plan negotiation. Counsel begins drafting the petition and first-day motion package in parallel.
Wall-crossings and ad hoc group formation (Weeks 4-10)
The RX bank reaches out to the largest holders in each major creditor class under NDAs, sharing MNPI on the company's situation and proposed restructuring framework. Holders with significant positions form ad hoc groups, retain joint counsel and FA, and begin substantive negotiation on plan terms.
RSA term-sheet negotiation (Weeks 6-14)
The debtor and the principal ad hoc groups negotiate the substantive economic and governance terms: enterprise value, recovery by class, equity allocation, governance arrangements, exit financing, management retention, releases. Term sheets typically iterate 5-15 times before finalization.
DIP RFP and commitment letter (Weeks 8-16)
In parallel with the RSA negotiation, the RX bank runs a competitive DIP shopping process between existing prepetition lenders and third-party private credit funds. The leading bidders negotiate detailed term sheets; the selected lender issues a binding commitment letter conditioned on closing conditions and bankruptcy court approval.
RSA execution and signature gathering (Weeks 12-20)
The RSA is finalized; signatories execute joinders. The RSA becomes effective when the threshold percentage in each impaired class signs.
Petition preparation and filing (Weeks 16-26)
The petition, schedules, statement of financial affairs, first-day motion package, and proposed DIP order are finalized. The debtor files the petition on the agreed date, typically with the RSA, DIP commitment, and first-day motion package all queued for simultaneous filing.
The CRO role deserves particular attention. A CRO is a senior officer of the company given broad powers to oversee all aspects of the restructuring. Most CROs assess the company's cash and liquidity through a 13-week cash flow forecast, develop profit-improvement initiatives, raise capital, manage stakeholder communication, and contribute to the plan of reorganization. The CRO often serves as the key witness on first-day declarations and at the confirmation hearing, with their credibility a material factor in court approval of the plan.
The RSA: Locking In Plan Support Before the Petition
The restructuring support agreement is the single most consequential pre-filing document. An RSA is a binding contract between the debtor and key creditor classes (typically the secured lender steering committee, the ad hoc bondholder group, sometimes equity sponsors, increasingly an ad hoc lender group representing private credit holders) that commits the signatories to support a specific Chapter 11 plan. The RSA sets out the plan terms in detail: the new capital structure, the treatment of each creditor class, recovery percentages, governance arrangements, exit financing terms, management retention, and the procedural milestones for the case. Once executed, the RSA creates a near-locked path from filing to confirmation, with material penalties for any signatory that breaks ranks.
The level of creditor support an RSA secures determines the case type. An RSA signed by 90%+ of every impaired class typically supports a prepackaged Chapter 11 (where the plan is pre-voted before filing); an RSA signed by 60-80% supports a pre-arranged case (where the plan is negotiated but not pre-voted); an RSA signed only by the secured lender steering committee or by a single major class supports a hybrid or partial-RSA case. The RSA's execution thresholds (often expressed as percentages of the affected debt held by signatories) are the single best metric for evaluating how clean the case is likely to be.
| Recent Case | RSA Support Level | Resulting Case Type | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mallinckrodt (Aug 2023) | 72% of first-lien plus 71% of second-lien | Prepackaged with confirmation in 43 days | Reduced funded debt by $1.9 billion; emerged within 78 days with first-lien at $1.65 billion (down from $2.86 billion) |
| CURO (Mar 2024) | 74% of first-lien plus the 1.5L and senior secured notes | Prepackaged | Reduced debt by approximately $1 billion; saved $75 million annually in cash interest |
| Enviva (Mar 2024) | ~95% of 2026 senior notes | Prepackaged | Comprehensive financial restructuring with broad bondholder support |
| Wolfspeed (Jun 2025) | 97% of senior secured notes plus 67% of convertibles plus Renesas U.S. sub | Prepackaged | Reduced debt by approximately $4.6 billion (70%) |
The RSA negotiation runs through diagnostic (weeks 1-4), engagement (weeks 4-12), and execution (weeks 10-18) stages, with the steps block above mapping the parallel workstreams.
RSA Milestones and Backstop Economics
A typical modern RSA includes a tightly drafted milestone schedule that maps the case from filing through emergence. The schedule is binding on signatories: missing a milestone gives any signatory the right to terminate the agreement. Recent 2024-2025 RSAs have used milestone schedules in the following form.
| Milestone | Typical Date Relative to Filing | Effect of Missing |
|---|---|---|
| Petition filing | Day 0 | RSA becomes effective; automatic stay attaches |
| First-day order entry | Days 1-2 | Operations protected; interim DIP funded |
| Final DIP order | Days 30-45 | Full DIP facility released; roll-up effective |
| Plan and disclosure statement filing | Days 30-60 | Vote process can begin |
| Disclosure statement approval | Days 60-90 | Solicitation begins |
| Plan confirmation hearing | Days 90-150 | Plan confirmed by court |
| Effective date | Days 100-180 | Reorganized entity emerges |
Recent specific milestone schedules illustrate the pattern. One 2025 case set milestones at filing of the proposed plan and disclosure statement by December 6, disclosure-statement hearing by January 22, plan confirmation hearing by February 25, and emergence by March 17. Another case set entry of the interim DIP order at January 1, the final DIP order at February 2, the final confirmation order at February 27, and the effective date at March 14.
Backstop fee economics are one of the most negotiated RSA provisions. RSA signatories who backstop the new-money DIP commitment or the post-emergence equity rights offering typically receive substantial fees in exchange for the commitment risk. Recent precedents include closing fees of 5% of the new-money portion plus commitment fees of 10% paid in-kind to backstop parties when the initial term loans fund; 2.5% backstop premiums on new-money DIP commitments; and 8% backstop premiums on post-emergence rights-offering shares. The fees are sized to compensate the backstop parties for the risk of having to fund their full commitment if other holders do not participate. The November 2025 ConvergeOne ruling, however, has put pressure on exclusive backstop arrangements that grant economic value only to specific signatories within a class, with courts increasingly scrutinizing whether such arrangements satisfy the equal-treatment requirement of Section 1123(a)(4).
The Wolfspeed Walk-Through (June 2025)
The Wolfspeed Chapter 11 (June 2025) illustrates how the pre-filing process plays out for a complex multi-stakeholder credit. The pre-petition negotiation timeline ran roughly as follows. May 8, 2025: Wolfspeed disclosed on its quarterly earnings call that it might pursue an in-court solution, marking the public disclosure that an RSA was in negotiation. By June 2025: negotiations between Wolfspeed management and the senior secured noteholder group (with Apollo positioned to take effective control through equity conversion) produced the executed RSA, with Renesas (a key customer and prepetition unsecured creditor) agreeing to convert its outstanding loan into a combination of equity and secured convertible debt. Renesas Electronics expected to record a loss of approximately $1.7 billion related to its Wolfspeed exposure and the deposit conversion. June 30, 2025: Wolfspeed filed for Chapter 11 with 97% of senior secured noteholder support, 67% of convertible noteholder support, plus Renesas U.S. subsidiary support. September 29, 2025: Wolfspeed emerged after a 91-day case, eliminating $4.6 billion of debt (70% of total) and cutting interest expense roughly 60%. CFIUS clearance for the Renesas equity issuance came in late January 2026, illustrating that emergence does not always conclude every regulatory approval workstream.
DIP Shopping: Sourcing the Lifeblood Before the Filing
Concurrent with the RSA negotiation, the debtor's RX bank runs a DIP shopping process to source the post-petition financing that will fund the case. DIP financing is the lifeblood of Chapter 11: without it, the company cannot pay employees, vendors, or professionals, and the case typically converts to Chapter 7 liquidation. The DIP shopping process is designed to produce a competitive offer that the bankruptcy court will approve at the first-day hearing.
The DIP universe divides into two categories. Existing lenders (the prepetition first-lien lenders or, less commonly, second-lien lenders) often want to provide the DIP because doing so preserves their structural priority and lets them roll their prepetition debt into the post-petition facility. Third-party DIP funds (Apollo, Oaktree, Centerbridge, Bain Capital Special Situations, Sixth Street, Silver Point, Ares, Citadel, KKR Credit) compete to provide DIP financing as a way of taking control of distressed credit. The competitive tension between existing lenders and third-party funds is the dynamic the RX bank exploits to maximize the debtor's negotiating leverage.
The DIP shopping process runs in parallel with the RSA negotiation:
1. Weeks 1-4: RX bank distributes an information package to a curated list of potential DIP lenders under NDAs 2. Weeks 4-6: evaluates initial bids on pricing, structure, and conditionality and advances 2-4 finalists 3. Weeks 6-12: runs detailed term-sheet negotiation and documentation drafting 4. Weeks 10-14: secures a binding commitment letter from the lead bidder 5. Day 1: files the commitment with the petition for first-day approval
The First Brands case illustrates the modern DIP shopping process at scale. The company filed in SDTX on September 28, 2025 with a $1.1 billion DIP commitment from an ad hoc group of pre-petition lenders. The interim DIP order released funding on October 1, 2025; the final order released the full $1.1 billion at the second-day hearing on November 6-7, 2025. The DIP terms included strict milestones requiring the debtor to deliver a business plan by January 31, 2026, an RSA by March 28, 2026, and a sale-process launch by March 28, 2026, illustrating how DIP milestones effectively control the case timeline. Other 2024-2025 examples include Enviva's prepetition first-lien lender DIP (March 2024), CURO's $70 million new-money DIP (March 2024), and Azul's complex priming DIP (filed May 28, 2025; final order July 28, 2025).
Stakeholder Outreach: Wall-Crossings and Coalition-Building
The RSA negotiation and DIP shopping require the RX bank to conduct sustained wall-crossing outreach: holders sign NDAs to receive MNPI in exchange for trading restrictions, then receive a "wall-cross deck" with financial projections, debt covenant analysis, proposed plan terms, DIP structure, and recovery analysis. The largest 5-15 holders in each class are typically identified through 13F/13D filings and CUSIP-tracking services. Holders that decline either stay on the public side or wait for "cleansing materials" that let them rejoin the trading universe.
| Holder Type | Outreach Mechanism | Typical Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Largest secured holders (top 5-10) | Direct wall-crossing with the debtor's RX bank | Form secured-lender steering committee with retained advisors |
| Bondholder ad hoc group | Counsel-led organization with shared RX bank | Negotiate plan terms collectively; sign RSA together |
| Private credit DIP candidates | RFP process under NDAs | Submit DIP bids; one selected as lead arranger |
| Smaller secured holders | Public solicitation through formal voting process | Vote on plan once disclosure statement is approved |
| Trade creditors | Limited prepetition outreach; engaged through UCC post-filing | Negotiate critical-vendor protection in first-day motions |
| Equity sponsors | Direct negotiation with the company's board | Either bridge equity in or accept dilution; may receive management retention or new equity in plan |
The Enviva ad hoc group (~95% of 2026 senior notes; March 2024) is a canonical recent example of well-organized prepetition bondholder coalition. The CURO ad hoc group (Oaktree, Caspian Capital, Empyrean Capital Partners; March 2024) illustrates how distressed credit funds organize as the prepetition advisor coalition that carries through into the case. The Wolfspeed RSA (97% of senior secured notes plus 67% of convertibles; June 2025) shows how outreach can secure near-unanimous support across multiple classes when the underlying economics work for everyone.
Documentation Workstreams
The pre-filing phase produces a comprehensive documentation package that is filed with the petition. The major documents fall into three categories: petition and supporting schedules, the first-day motion package, and substantive deal documents (RSA, DIP credit agreement, plan, disclosure statement). The drafting work happens in parallel across several teams.
Petition and schedules
Form 201 (the voluntary petition) is short and procedural, but the supporting schedules are extensive: schedules of assets and liabilities (Schedules A through H), statement of financial affairs, list of equity security holders, list of largest 30 unsecured creditors, list of insiders, and various other administrative documents. The work is detail-intensive and typically falls to the company's CFO and the bankruptcy counsel's restructuring team.
First-day motion package
Typically 15-25 motions covering wages, benefits, cash management, utilities, critical vendors, customer programs, insurance, taxes, professional retention, joint administration, and DIP financing. Each motion is supported by a declaration from a senior officer (often the CRO) explaining why the relief is necessary and what relief would be requested. The motion package can run 1,500-3,000 pages including exhibits.
Substantive deal documents
The RSA, the proposed DIP credit agreement, the proposed plan of reorganization, and the disclosure statement (filed shortly after the petition or at filing in the case of a prepack). These documents capture the substantive deal terms and form the legal basis for the eventual confirmation order.
Dual-Track Contingency Planning
A defining feature of modern restructuring engagements is the dual-track approach in which the company simultaneously prepares for an out-of-court restructuring (LMT, DEO, debt-for-equity swap) and an in-court Chapter 11 backstop. The dual-track strategy lets the company pursue whichever path produces better economics, with the threat of the Chapter 11 backstop sharpening creditor incentives in the out-of-court negotiations.
The dual-track work typically runs through the same advisor team. The RX bank that is shopping the DIP also evaluates LMT structures; the counsel team drafting the petition is also drafting any out-of-court exchange offer documentation; the FA building the projections supports both the out-of-court recovery analysis and the Chapter 11 plan. The cost of dual-tracking is real (advisor fees roughly double the single-track cost), but the strategic value is large: the threat of the Chapter 11 backstop produces materially better outcomes in many out-of-court engagements, and the embedded Chapter 11 readiness lets the company pivot quickly if the out-of-court path fails.
Mallinckrodt second filing as recent example
The Mallinckrodt second filing in August 2023 is a recent example. The company had originally restructured out of bankruptcy in 2020 (its first Chapter 11), and the second filing in 2023 came after a sustained period of dual-track engagement during which the company explored further out-of-court alternatives before pivoting to a prepackaged Chapter 11. The resulting prepack was confirmed in 43 days (and emerged within 78 days), eliminated all second-lien debt, reduced first-lien from $2.86 billion to $1.65 billion, and reduced total funded debt by $1.9 billion with broad creditor support.
The pre-filing phase is where modern restructuring practice concentrates its strategic work. The deliverables produced during this phase (RSA, DIP, first-day motions, ad hoc coalitions) determine almost everything about how the eventual Chapter 11 case unfolds. Restructuring bankers spend the majority of their pre-petition time on RSA negotiation and DIP shopping, with each major deal anchored on the relationship-building and term-negotiation work that characterizes high-quality pre-filing preparation.


