Interview Questions140

    Who Sells Fund Interests: Pensions, Endowments, Sovereigns

    Pensions, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, insurers and fund-of-funds sell LP interests differently: who approves, what they sell, how they run a sale.

    |
    7 min read
    |
    2 interview questions
    |
    Share

    Introduction

    Before a buyer opens the data room, the seller's name has already told it three things: how long the seller can wait, who else will eventually learn the price, and whether the same institution will be back with another portfolio next year. That is why private capital advisory (PCA) bankers sort limited partners (LPs) by institution type as well as by motive. The motives themselves, from overallocation to budget pressure, are set out in why LPs and GPs need liquidity. What differs by seller is the decision chain behind a sale, the fund interests it brings, and how it behaves once bids arrive. The mix moves quickly too: in Evercore's count, sovereign wealth funds went from a rounding error to a major seller group in one year.

    How the LP Seller Mix Shifted in 2025

    Evercore's 2025 secondary market report splits $120 billion of LP-led volume by seller type. Categories differ by survey (Jefferies groups pensions with sovereigns), so shares are not interchangeable.

    Seller typeShare of 2025 LP-led volumeShare in 2024
    Fund-of-funds23%13%
    Public pension21%31%
    Endowment or foundation12%10%
    Sovereign wealth fund12%2%
    Insurance company10%12%
    Corporate pension9%8%
    Family office8%7%
    Bank1%8%
    Other4%9%

    Fund-of-funds became the largest group, sovereigns multiplied their share sixfold, and banks nearly vanished. Evercore also found 83% of volume was intermediated by an advisor, split roughly evenly between repeat sellers and new ones, and 71% came from North American sellers.

    Public and Corporate Pensions

    Public Pensions: Board Policy and Open Records

    A public pension rarely decides to sell in one meeting. The trigger usually appears in an allocation review, the process described in pacing and the denominator effect, and the sale runs under an investment policy that says whether the board votes or staff act within delegated limits and report back. The Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS), a repeat seller, shows how visible the result is: staff reported to the board in October 2024 on 13 private equity funds with a net asset value (NAV) of $822 million, sold in a deal that had closed on 30 September, and by March 2025 were updating trustees on a second sale of about $935 million across 16 funds.

    Both sales were announced after public board meetings, and that publicity is the defining constraint. Public pensions sit under open-records laws with specific carve-outs for fund documents. California's code, for example, sets out which alternative-investment records public pensions and public endowments must release:

    • Exempt: fund financial statements, capital call and distribution notices, and partnership agreements.
    • Disclosed: each fund's name and vintage, contributions, distributions, net internal rate of return (IRR), multiple, and fees.

    Corporate Pensions Heading for an Insurer

    A corporate pension answers to trustees and a sponsoring company, and many mature plans, particularly in the UK, are heading toward an insurer. Insurers usually take the premium in cash or liquid assets, so private equity interests often have to be sold first: in Standard Life's April 2026 survey release, 76% of UK defined benefit (DB) schemes above £1 billion named secondary sales as their preferred route for illiquid assets.

    Pension Risk Transfer

    A transaction in which a defined benefit pension plan passes some or all of its obligations to an insurer, through a buy-in (a policy held by the plan) or a buyout (the insurer takes over the liabilities), in exchange for a premium.

    This seller has a hard date set by the insurer's timetable, so certainty of closing can outweigh the last point of price, and deferred-payment bids fit poorly.

    Sovereign Wealth Funds: Large, Quiet, and Increasingly Repeat

    A sovereign wealth fund answers to a government owner rather than a public board, and can sell a billion dollars of NAV without a press release. Recent reporting describes repeat sellers in Asia. Singapore's GIC sold private equity interests with more than $1 billion of NAV in 2025 and was reported in August 2026 to be marketing a second portfolio of similar size with PJT Partners advising. China Investment Corporation (CIC) sold roughly $1 billion of US private equity fund stakes, including Carlyle and Hellman & Friedman funds, after seeking to reduce its private markets exposure; Bloomberg reported in April 2026 that Goldman Sachs and Ardian were the buyers.

    Large multi-manager sovereign portfolios suit this kind of split, the subject of mosaic bids and portfolio construction. Yet Asia-Pacific institutions were only 3% of Evercore's 2025 seller volume, so the Asian sovereign seller is a growth story, not an established category; how sovereign wealth funds invest explains where their capital goes.

    Endowments and Foundations: Trustees, Budgets, and the Message

    An endowment sells under an investment committee of trustees, and its liquidity need runs straight into the university budget. Harvard's endowment distributions covered nearly 40% of the university's operating revenue in fiscal 2025, so slow private equity distributions become a budget problem.

    Endowment Spending Rule

    The policy that sets how much an endowment pays out each year, usually a percentage of a multi-year average of its value. The average effective rate among US colleges and universities was 4.9% in fiscal 2025, according to the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) and Commonfund.

    What an endowment guards most is manager access, since its model depends on getting into oversubscribed funds. When Yale's Evercore-run sale became public in April 2025, the university stressed it would keep committing to its current managers' new funds. Harvard Management Company chief executive N.P. Narvekar wrote in the fiscal 2025 annual letter that its secondary sales were "not signs of constraint or liquidity concerns", even as Harvard's private equity allocation rose to 41%.

    For the advisor, narrative control is part of the mandate: which funds go and what the institution says afterwards. How the seller mix has moved since is tracked in the changing secondaries seller base.

    The Other Sellers and the Rise of Repeat Sellers

    Insurers, Banks, Family Offices, and Fund-of-Funds

    Insurers and banks sell under a regulator's eye: capital charges make fund interests costly to hold, so a rule change can force a sale, though insurers can instead use collateralized fund obligations, which repackage fund interests into rated notes. Family offices can decide quickly, with a family or small team signing off. Fund-of-funds sell as fiduciaries to their own investors, often to wind down vehicles near term end; Jefferies' review of the first half of 2025 found they favoured affiliate-vehicle and managed-fund structures that work around transfer restrictions and keep GP relationships.

    Comparing Seller Types in a Process

    Side by side, each seller type has its own approval route and its own binding constraint, the thing an advisor cannot trade away for price:

    SellerWho signs offWhat it tends to sellWhat it guards
    Public pensionBoard, or staff under policyNon-core managersA defensible price
    Corporate pensionTrustees and sponsorIlliquids before an insurer dealCertainty by a date
    Sovereign wealth fundInternal committeeLarge multi-manager portfoliosConfidentiality
    Endowment or foundationTrustee committeeFunds outside core managersManager access
    Insurer or bankManagement, under capital rulesCapital-heavy positionsCapital relief
    Family officePrincipalsSingle interestsSpeed
    Fund-of-fundsManager, for its own LPsVehicles near term endGP relationships

    The last column shapes the process: a deadline demands certain closing, a sovereign a discreet buyer list, an endowment buyers its managers will accept.

    Programmatic Sellers

    The shift that matters most for advisors is toward programmatic sellers. CPP Investments, which manages the Canada Pension Plan, sold 25 interests in North American and European buyout funds more than ten years old, to Ares and CVC Secondary Partners for about C$1.2 billion of net proceeds in March 2025, and called itself a systematic buyer and seller in the market. PSERS returned within six months of its first sale, and GIC was marketing a second portfolio in 2026.

    A repeat seller is also a repeat client, and buyers remember whether its last data was clean and its winning bids closed. For a first-time seller the advisor supplies the process; for a repeat seller it also protects a market reputation the next auction trades on, which is why the LP portfolio sale process starts with the seller's history as well as its fund list.

    Interview Questions

    2
    Question #1Easy

    Why do LPs sell fund interests in the secondary market, even when the underlying assets are performing well?

    Because the reason for a sale is usually the seller's situation, not the assets. Common motives:

    • •Liquidity: the LP needs cash for its own obligations, such as pension payments, an endowment's budget or calls from newer funds, and distributions have slowed.
    • •Allocation: it is over its private equity target after public markets fell (the denominator effect) or it has changed its strategy.
    • •Portfolio management: cutting the number of GP relationships, exiting a strategy or region, or recycling older funds into newer ones.
    • •Regulation: capital rules for banks and insurers can make holding private equity expensive.
    • •Administration: a long tail of small positions costs time and money to monitor.

    A performing portfolio actually sells more easily and closer to NAV, which is why good assets make up much of the LP-led market.

    Rate yourself:
    Question #2Medium

    Why would an LP sell an interest in a young fund with a large unfunded commitment rather than only its oldest funds?

    Because the burden is often the unfunded commitment, not the NAV. A young fund still has most of its capital to call, so selling it removes years of future calls from the LP's cash planning and cuts its total exposure to private equity, which may be the real goal if it is over-allocated or short of liquidity.

    Other reasons:

    • •Pricing: young funds with recent marks often sell close to NAV, while old tail-end funds sell at deep discounts, so including them lifts the portfolio's blended price.
    • •Strategy change: if the LP is leaving a manager or a strategy, the newest fund is the one that ties it in longest.
    • •Buyer demand: good young funds attract many bidders, which helps the whole sale.

    The cost is giving up the young fund's upside, which the seller weighs against the discount and the liquidity freed.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    Investment Banking in Hong Kong and Singapore

    Investment banking in Hong Kong and Singapore: how the two hubs split Asia, Mandarin rules, APAC recruiting dates, visas, and analyst pay in HKD and SGD.

    August 27, 2026

    How to Value a Bank: FIG Valuation Explained

    How to value a bank when EV/EBITDA breaks down: master P/TBV, ROE, the justified P/B formula, and the dividend discount model for FIG interviews.

    July 20, 2026

    Buybacks vs Dividends: How Companies Return Cash

    Buybacks vs dividends explained: how each returns cash to shareholders, the tax and signaling differences, the EPS effect, and when each makes sense.

    June 25, 2026

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource