Interview Questions140

    Preferred Equity and Structured Fund Solutions

    How fund-level preferred equity from 17Capital and Dawson (formerly Whitehorse) raises cash without a sale, and when it beats a NAV loan.

    |
    7 min read
    |
    2 interview questions
    |
    Share

    Introduction

    When staff at the Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS) recommended a $200 million commitment to Whitehorse Liquidity Partners IV in May 2020, its investment memorandum filed the fund under private credit, although the fund would invest mainly through preferred equity. The instrument is credit to the pension that funds it, equity in the vehicle that issues it, and leverage in the sample fund language of the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA). The investor is paid ahead of the owners, like a lender, yet has no repayment date to default on and usually no loan-to-value (LTV) test, like an owner. That mix is why a general partner (GP) or limited partner (LP) wanting cash without selling, and without the covenants of a net asset value (NAV) loan, asks its private capital advisory (PCA) team about it.

    How a Fund-Level Preferred Equity Deal Is Built

    Most structures start with a holding vehicle. The fund, or an LP, contributes company stakes or fund interests to a new special purpose vehicle (SPV) for its common equity, and the preferred investor subscribes cash for a senior class. The cash passes up to the contributor and no outside buyer takes the portfolio.

    Fund-Level Preferred Equity

    Capital invested in a vehicle holding private equity investments or fund interests, entitled to the portfolio's distributions ahead of the common equity until it has received an agreed return or multiple, and usually to a share of later distributions. Unlike a NAV loan, it typically has no fixed maturity and pays no cash interest.

    The Priority Waterfall and the Equity Kicker

    17Capital, which says it pioneered preferred equity on private equity portfolios, wrote in a 2019 note on the product that a typical structure has no cash-pay interest, restrictive covenants, or fixed maturity. The investor is paid from distributions, whenever they arrive, in a fixed order:

    1

    Portfolio distributions

    Exit proceeds and dividends flow into the holding vehicle.

    2

    Priority to the preferred

    The investor takes all, or an agreed high share, of distributions until it has its capital back plus a target set as a multiple, an internal rate of return (IRR), or the greater of the two.

    3

    Upside split

    A small share of later distributions keeps going to the investor.

    4

    Residual to the owners

    Everything else goes to the fund or LP that contributed the portfolio.

    Terms are private and rarely published, so the figures below are illustrative. What matters is how the target return and the upside share interact: a low target with a generous share can cost more than a higher target with none.

    Equity Kicker

    A share of distributions or gains paid to a senior capital provider after its priority return has been met, letting it accept a lower fixed return in exchange for participating in the upside.

    Cash Recipient, Obligor, and Ranking

    The questions used across the fund finance map set preferred equity apart, above all on obligor and priority:

    QuestionFund-level preferred equityNAV loan, for contrast
    Cash recipientThe fund (GP-led) or the contributing LPThe fund or its SPV
    ObligorNone: an equity claimThe fund or SPV
    SecurityUsually none; priority sits in the waterfallHolding-vehicle equity, distribution accounts
    ConsentsLPA and LPAC; GP transfer consent if LP-ledBorrowing limits and LPAC
    PriorityAhead of the common, behind company debtAhead of LPs, behind company debt
    DilutionUpside shared through the kickerNone beyond interest

    The obligor row carries the most weight, because it decides what happens to the owners when marks fall before the exits arrive.

    GP-Led and LP-Led Uses

    The PSERS memo described Whitehorse's product as liquidity for LPs and GPs through preferred equity in their portfolio interests, an alternative to both ordinary leverage and an outright secondary sale.

    Fund Liquidity, Follow-Ons, and Early DPI

    In the GP-led version, a fund contributes several companies. The cash can fund follow-on investments the fund can no longer make from its commitments, refinance fund-level debt, or go to LPs early, raising distributions to paid-in capital (DPI) without a realization. No LP elects anything, which places the deal in the family described in the GP-led overview, and consent runs through the limited partnership agreement (LPA) and the limited partner advisory committee (LPAC).

    That definition and the consents ILPA attaches to it are covered in NAV lending in practice.

    An LP Raising Cash While Keeping Upside

    The LP-led version starts from a seller that dislikes the bids. Instead of selling at a discount, the LP contributes its fund interests, takes the preferred investor's cash, and keeps the residual: the structured secondary sale. Each interest still moves into a new vehicle, so the transfer provisions of every underlying fund apply, as the transfer mechanics article explains, and the LP's residual now sits behind a senior claim.

    Preferred Equity or a NAV Loan

    The choice trades cost of capital against flexibility. A fund holds a portfolio marked at 250 (millions of dollars) and needs 50. A NAV lender offers 8% paid in kind, a three-year maturity, and a 30% maximum LTV. A preferred investor offers the same 50 for priority distributions until it has received 1.35x, or 67.5, then 10% of later distributions, with no maturity or LTV test.

    Illustrative outcomeNAV loanPreferred equity
    Paid to provider if 325 is distributed in year three63.093.3
    Same 325, arriving in year five73.5, after refinancing at year three93.3
    Marks fall 35% in year oneLTV about 33%: cure, sweep, or recallNo test; distributions wait
    Only 175 distributed, by year five73.578.3

    The loan is cheaper in every row where it survives. Preferred equity sells the absence of a maturity that can force a refinancing and an LTV covenant a markdown can breach, and it moves timing risk to the investor: when the 325 arrives two years late, the fund's cost is unchanged while the investor's annual return falls from about 23% to about 13%.

    When Each Structure Wins

    Four tests usually decide it:

    • Portfolio shape: diversified portfolios with visible exits support a cheap loan; concentrated ones get a low LTV and real breach risk.
    • Exit timing: uncertain dates favour an instrument without a maturity.
    • Expected upside: the kicker is paid in the good outcomes, so a GP expecting large gains gives away more.
    • Investor treatment: how the LPA defines borrowing, and how the provider is regulated.

    The last point matters for insurers. Under Solvency II's standard formula, unlisted equity carries a 49% capital charge before the symmetric adjustment, as the FIG guide on insurance capital rules explains, which can make a position classified as equity costly to hold. Insurers often reach these portfolios through loans and rated notes, the structures behind collateralized fund obligations.

    The Providers: 17Capital and Dawson

    17Capital closed Fund 5 at its $2.9 billion hard cap in a July 2021 fundraise of $4.5 billion for non-dilutive financing in exchange for exposure to portfolio cash flows. Whitehorse Liquidity Partners, founded in 2015 by Yann Robard, formerly head of secondaries and co-investments at the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, renamed itself Dawson in April 2024.

    In 2020, Whitehorse estimated the annual opportunity for structured liquidity at $4 billion to $8 billion, against about $80 billion of 2019 secondary volume. In October 2025, Dawson closed Portfolio Finance 6 at its $7.0 billion hard cap, over $7.7 billion with affiliated vehicles: one fund now larger than the firm's own estimate of the whole yearly market five years earlier.

    The preferred position often ends as the loan it was chosen over. Terms commonly let the sponsor redeem once cheaper financing or an exit allows, after a lock-up and subject to a minimum return, so a fund that carried preferred equity through weak marks can refinance with a NAV loan once lenders will size against the portfolio again. That minimum return is the price of the option to switch, and it belongs in the comparison from the first term sheet.

    Interview Questions

    2
    Question #1Easy

    What is fund-level preferred equity, and how does it differ from a NAV loan?

    Fund-level preferred equity is an investment in a fund's portfolio that has priority over the existing investors: the preferred investor receives most or all distributions until it gets a fixed return or multiple, then shares in the upside.

    How it differs from a NAV loan:

    • •Legal form: it is equity, not debt, so there are usually no loan-to-value covenants or margin calls.
    • •Cost: it is more expensive than a NAV loan, because the investor takes more risk and may get a share of upside.
    • •Size: it can usually provide more capital relative to NAV.
    • •Repayment: it is repaid from distributions and usually has no fixed maturity, unlike a loan.

    GPs use it when a NAV loan is not available or not large enough, or when they want to avoid covenants, at the cost of giving up more of the fund's upside.

    Rate yourself:
    Question #2Hard

    A fund with a portfolio marked at $400 million sells $100 million of preferred equity. The preferred investor takes 100% of distributions until it has received 1.3x, then 10% of everything after. What multiple does it earn if the portfolio distributes $430 million in total, and what if it distributes only $250 million?

    It earns 1.6x if the portfolio distributes $430 million, and 1.42x if it distributes only $250 million.

    High case (430):

    • •First tier: 1.3 × $100 million = $130 million.
    • •Remainder: 430 − 130 = $300 million, of which 10% = $30 million.
    • •Total: 160, or 1.6x.

    Low case (250):

    • •First tier: $130 million.
    • •Remainder: 250 − 130 = $120 million, of which 10% = $12 million.
    • •Total: 142, or 1.42x.

    The preferred investor is protected in the downside, because it is paid first, and still participates in the upside. The fund's existing LPs keep $270 million in the high case but only $108 million in the low case, so they bear most of the risk.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    How to Value a Bank: FIG Valuation Explained

    How to value a bank when EV/EBITDA breaks down: master P/TBV, ROE, the justified P/B formula, and the dividend discount model for FIG interviews.

    July 20, 2026

    Buybacks vs Dividends: How Companies Return Cash

    Buybacks vs dividends explained: how each returns cash to shareholders, the tax and signaling differences, the EPS effect, and when each makes sense.

    June 25, 2026

    Why Are Investment Banking Bonuses So High?

    Why investment banking bonuses are so high: the revenue-per-head economics, the compensation ratio, why pay is bonus-heavy and cyclical, and the real catch.

    May 27, 2026

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource