Interview Questions157

    Inventory Write-Downs: Lower of Cost and NRV

    When inventory is worth less than it cost, it is written down to net realizable value. How the test works, why US GAAP does not reverse it, and what to check.

    |
    4 min read
    |
    1 interview question
    |
    Share

    Introduction

    In 2023, Pfizer recorded $6.2 billion of inventory write-offs and related charges in its cost of sales, $5.0 billion for its COVID treatment Paxlovid and $1.2 billion for its vaccine Comirnaty, as its 2023 annual report on Form 10-K shows. Demand had collapsed, and the doses and treatment courses it had built up were worth far less than they cost to make. The charges did not use any cash, because the cash had been spent when the products were manufactured. They recognized that the money would not come back.

    An inventory write-down applies the same principle to every company that holds stock: inventory cannot stay on the balance sheet at more than the business expects to recover from it. Its statement effects follow the pattern of any non-cash charge, traced in impairments and write-downs on the three statements; what is particular to inventory is the test that decides when value has fallen, and the lower cost it leaves behind.

    The Test: Lower of Cost and Net Realizable Value

    Since Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-11, US generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) have measured inventory valued on first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost at the lower of cost and net realizable value, under the inventory topic, Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 330. If a product's expected selling price, less the costs still needed to complete and sell it, falls below its cost, the company writes inventory down to that net realizable value and records the loss, usually in cost of goods sold.

    Net realizable value

    The estimated selling price of inventory in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Inventory measured on FIFO or average cost is written down to net realizable value when that amount falls below cost.

    Inventory valued on last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method still follows the older lower of cost or market test, which compares cost with replacement cost, bounded above by net realizable value and below by net realizable value less a normal profit margin. Because LIFO inventory is usually carried at older, lower costs, it fails the test less often; the choice of method is covered in inventory costing: FIFO, LIFO and weighted average.

    The test is usually applied item by item or by groups of similar items, and the common triggers are obsolescence, damage, excess quantities, falling selling prices and expiry dates. Suppose a company holds a product that cost $500, which it now expects to sell for $420, with $40 of costs still needed to sell it:

    Balance sheet
    Inventory written down to net realizable value
    $
    Line itemAmount
    Inventory at cost500
    Expected selling price420
    Less costs to complete and sell(40)
    Net realizable value380
    Write-down charged to cost of goods sold120
    Inventory carried after the write-down380

    The 380 becomes the new cost basis of the inventory; under US GAAP it is not written back up if prices recover.

    Under US GAAP, the written-down amount becomes the inventory's new cost basis. If prices later recover, the write-down is not reversed; PwC's guide to lower of cost or market notes that the reduced amount is treated as cost for later accounting, with an exception only for recoveries in a later interim period of the same fiscal year.

    What Bankers Check

    A write-down moves the statements like other non-cash charges: cost of goods sold rises, net income falls by the after-tax amount, the charge is added back on the cash flow statement, and inventory falls. For US tax, a reserve for an estimated fall in value is not deductible (Treasury Regulation 1.471-2); the loss usually counts only when the goods are sold, scrapped or offered for sale at the lower price, so the tax saving first appears as a deferred tax asset (tax the company expects to save later), as it did at Pfizer in 2023. For analysis, three points matter more than the mechanics:

    • Recurring or one-off: some write-downs, such as Pfizer's, follow an unusual collapse in demand; others, such as routine provisions for obsolete stock at a fashion or electronics retailer, recur every year and belong in normal margins.
    • Later margins: goods written down and then sold carry the lower cost basis, so the sale shows a higher gross margin than the product really earns, a delayed boost from the earlier charge.
    • Reserve trends: the inventory note often shows gross inventory and a reserve for obsolete and slow-moving stock; a reserve growing faster than inventory can signal aging stock or weakening demand.

    The related allowances for receivables, returns and warranties, which follow similar estimation logic, are covered in reserves and allowances. For inventory, the test is simple to state and judgment-heavy to apply: stock is worth no more than the business can sell it for, and the timing of that conclusion decides which year absorbs the loss.

    Interview Questions

    1
    Question #1Medium

    A company writes off $100 of obsolete inventory and scraps it (25% tax, deductible on disposal). Walk me through the statements.

    Net income falls by $75, cash rises by $25, and inventory falls by $100.

    1. 1.Income statement: the $100 write-off is usually charged to cost of goods sold, so pre-tax income falls by $100. Because the stock is scrapped, the loss is deductible now, so taxes fall by $25 and net income falls by $75.
    2. 2.Cash flow statement: net income down $75, plus the $100 non-cash write-off added back (or shown as the decrease in inventory), so operating cash flow rises by $25, the tax saved.
    3. 3.Balance sheet: inventory down $100, cash up $25, so assets fall by $75; retained earnings fall by $75. It balances.

    The tax assumption matters: if the inventory were only written down to a lower value and kept, a US company generally couldn't deduct the reserve until the goods are sold or scrapped, so there would be no cash saving yet, just a $25 deferred tax asset.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    How to Value a Bank: FIG Valuation Explained

    How to value a bank when EV/EBITDA breaks down: master P/TBV, ROE, the justified P/B formula, and the dividend discount model for FIG interviews.

    July 20, 2026

    Buybacks vs Dividends: How Companies Return Cash

    Buybacks vs dividends explained: how each returns cash to shareholders, the tax and signaling differences, the EPS effect, and when each makes sense.

    June 25, 2026

    Why Are Investment Banking Bonuses So High?

    Why investment banking bonuses are so high: the revenue-per-head economics, the compensation ratio, why pay is bonus-heavy and cyclical, and the real catch.

    May 27, 2026

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource