Interview Questions157

    Accounting Red Flags Investment Bankers Look For

    Receivables outrunning sales, shrinking reserves, cash flow from selling receivables and auditor exits: the warning signs in the statements and what they mean.

    |
    8 min read
    |
    3 interview questions
    |
    Share
    US GAAPWritten under US GAAP. IFRS treats this topic the same way, so it applies to IFRS reporters too.

    Introduction

    In December 2020, General Electric agreed to pay a $200 million penalty to settle Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charges that it had misled investors about its power and insurance businesses. Much of what the SEC described had left traces in the company's own figures. GE's industrial cash flow had been boosted by selling receivables internally to its finance arm, GE Capital, which pulled forward cash that would otherwise have arrived in later years. A large share of its power profits in 2016 and 2017 came from reducing cost estimates on existing service contracts. And it had lowered its projections of future insurance claims costs while long-term care claims were rising, as the SEC's announcement of the settlement explains.

    None of these practices was hidden in the sense of being absent from the accounts. Each was a pattern that analysts could see, or ask about: cash flow rising faster than profits for reasons other than operations, profits supported by changes in estimates, reserves moving against the trend in claims. That is what accounting red flags are. They are not proof of wrongdoing, and most have innocent explanations. They are the patterns that tell an analyst where to look harder.

    Revenue Red Flags

    Revenue is the largest number in most income statements and the one most often managed, because small changes in timing move growth rates that investors watch closely.

    The most reliable signal is receivables growing faster than revenue. If customers are taking longer to pay, or the company is recognizing revenue before it has a firm claim to payment, receivables rise relative to sales. Days sales outstanding, receivables divided by revenue times the number of days in the period, turns that into a trend. A sustained rise deserves an explanation: a shift toward slower-paying customers, longer payment terms offered to win business, or revenue recorded too early. Growing unbilled receivables and contract assets, which represent revenue recognized but not yet invoiced, deserve the same attention, as described in accounts receivable and credit losses.

    Days sales outstanding

    Accounts receivable divided by revenue, multiplied by the number of days in the period, usually 365 for a year or about 91 for a quarter. It estimates how long customers take on average to pay, and a rising trend can signal looser credit terms, collection problems or revenue recognized before it was earned.

    Pulling Revenue Forward

    Timing can also be managed without breaking the recognition rules. Under Armour settled SEC charges in 2021 for $9 million after the agency found that, from the third quarter of 2015, it had pulled forward about $408 million of orders that customers had asked to be shipped later, to meet analysts' revenue estimates, without telling investors how much of its growth came from doing so. The sales themselves were not alleged to breach accounting rules; the problem was the undisclosed effect on growth. Signs of the practice include revenue concentrated at quarter ends, rising receivables and inventory at customers, and growth that slows sharply once the pulling forward stops. For companies selling through distributors, rising channel inventory, sometimes disclosed as weeks of supply, is the equivalent signal.

    Other revenue signals include changes in revenue recognition policies, a growing share of revenue from related parties, bill-and-hold arrangements and, in subscription businesses, deferred revenue that falls while reported revenue rises, which can mean customers are paying in advance less than before.

    Expense and Reserve Red Flags

    Profits can also be raised by reducing expenses that rest on judgment. The patterns are well known:

    • Capitalized costs rising faster than the business, such as software development, customer acquisition or interest costs added to assets rather than expensed.
    • Longer depreciation lives or higher salvage values, which lower annual depreciation without any change in the assets.
    • Reserves falling as a share of the items they cover: allowances for credit losses relative to receivables, warranty reserves relative to sales, inventory reserves relative to inventory.
    • Inventory growing faster than cost of sales, which may signal products that are not selling and write-downs to come.
    • Favorable changes in estimates, such as lower cost estimates on long-term contracts or more optimistic pension assumptions, that add to profit in the period they are made.

    GE's power business illustrates the last point: reducing the estimated costs of fulfilling existing long-term service agreements increased their profitability and flowed straight into earnings. Changes in estimates are legitimate and required when circumstances change, but a pattern of favorable changes in periods when the underlying business is weakening is a classic warning sign. A reserve that is built up in good years and released in bad ones, sometimes called a cookie jar reserve, smooths earnings in a way that hides the real trend. Depreciation lives deserve the same scrutiny: an extension disclosed as a change in estimate, of the kind discussed in useful lives and salvage value, can add materially to operating income in a single year.

    Cash Flow Red Flags

    Cash flow is harder to manipulate than earnings, which is why analysts rely on it, but it is not immune. The first test is the relationship between operating cash flow and net income over several years. Earnings that persistently exceed operating cash flow suggest accruals that may not turn into cash.

    The subtler problem is operating cash flow inflated by financing. Selling receivables to a factor brings cash in earlier and records it as operating cash flow, while the company may retain some of the risk; selling them to a captive finance arm, as GE did, has the same effect on a cash flow figure reported for the industrial business alone. Supplier finance programs, in which a bank pays the company's suppliers early and the company pays the bank later, let a company stretch its payment terms and raise operating cash flow without any change in operations; buyers must now disclose the key terms of these programs and the amounts outstanding under them, under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 405-50. Classification matters too: costs capitalized as investments leave operating cash flow and appear in investing, which flatters operating cash flow and free cash flow definitions that ignore part of capital spending. The reconciliation explained in cash flow from operations is where these effects show up.

    Disclosure and Governance Red Flags

    Some of the most important signals are outside the numbers. An auditor's resignation is rare and serious. In October 2024, Ernst & Young resigned as auditor of Super Micro Computer, saying it was unwilling to be associated with the financial statements prepared by management; the company disagreed, a special committee of its board later reported that the evidence it reviewed raised no substantial concerns about the integrity of senior management or the audit committee, and Super Micro appointed BDO as its new auditor and filed its delayed annual report the following year, as its annual report for that period describes. Whatever the eventual findings, a resignation of that kind changes the questions any banker or investor has to ask.

    Other governance signals include late filings, disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control, frequent changes of chief financial officer or auditor, restatements, frequent redefinitions of segments or of non-GAAP measures (figures that depart from generally accepted accounting principles), related-party transactions and compensation tied closely to metrics that management can influence through accounting choices. A widening gap between reported and adjusted earnings, or add-backs that recur every year, is a related signal, examined in non-GAAP measures. The ways restatements and changes in accounting are reported are covered in restatements and accounting changes.

    A Checklist

    Most of these signals come down to a ratio tracked over several periods or a disclosure read closely, and the table pairs each red flag with what to calculate or read and what it may signal:

    Red flagWhat to calculate or readWhat it may signal
    Receivables outgrowing revenueDays sales outstanding over several periodsEarly recognition, looser terms, collection problems
    Inventory outgrowing cost of salesDays inventory outstanding, inventory reservesSlow-moving stock, future write-downs
    Falling reservesAllowances, warranty and other reserves as a share of their baseEarnings supported by reserve releases
    Rising capitalized costsCapitalized costs relative to revenue and to expensed costsCosts moved off the income statement
    Earnings above cash flowOperating cash flow to net income over three to five yearsAccruals that may not convert to cash
    Cash flow from financing operationsFactoring, securitization and supplier finance disclosuresOperating cash flow pulled forward
    Favorable estimate changesDisclosures of changes in estimates and their effectProfits from assumptions rather than operations
    Auditor or finance team changesAuditor reports, 8-K filings, management changesDisagreements over accounting or controls

    How Bankers Use Red Flags

    In due diligence, red flags become questions for management and for the accountants preparing a quality of earnings report: why receivables days rose, what drove the release of a reserve, how much of operating cash flow came from factoring. In pitching and valuation, they decide which figures can be relied on and which need adjusting. In equity and debt offerings, they shape the disclosure the underwriters will insist on and the comfort they will seek from the auditors.

    Short sellers and investigative researchers use the same toolkit, often publishing reports that set out a series of red flags at once. Bankers working on a deal for a company that has been the subject of such a report need to understand each allegation, how the company has responded and what the evidence in the accounts actually shows, because buyers, lenders and regulators will ask the same questions.

    Interview Questions

    3
    Question #1Medium

    EBITDA grew 20% but operating cash flow fell. What could explain it?

    The gap is somewhere between EBITDA and operating cash flow, so I'd look at what sits between them:

    • •Working capital: receivables or inventory growing faster than sales is the most common cause. It can be benign (fast growth, a big sale at period end, a seasonal build) or a warning (looser credit terms, customers paying late, unsold stock, revenue recognized ahead of delivery).
    • •Cash items below EBITDA: higher cash interest after new borrowing, higher cash taxes, or restructuring and litigation payments excluded from adjusted EBITDA but paid in cash.
    • •Non-cash gains in EBITDA: gains on asset sales, favorable changes in estimates, reserve releases or income from equity investees that don't bring cash.
    • •Capitalization and classification: costs moved out of operating expenses into capex or capitalized software lift EBITDA without changing cash; conversely, a company that stopped selling receivables or using supplier finance loses a cash benefit.

    To tell which, I'd bridge EBITDA to operating cash flow line by line, track DSO, DIO and DPO over several quarters, check reserves against the items they cover, and see whether the gap persists. A one-year gap with a clear working capital reason is common; earnings persistently above cash flow is a classic red flag.

    Rate yourself:
    Question #2Medium

    The same "one-time" add-backs appear every year. How do you challenge them?

    If they recur, they are a cost of running the business, and adjusted EBITDA overstates earnings by treating them as exceptional.

    How to challenge them:

    1. 1.Look at the history: line up the add-backs over three to five years. Restructuring every year, "integration costs" from a steady stream of acquisitions, or litigation that keeps coming back under different names means the costs are recurring.
    2. 2.Ask what drives them: for some businesses a cost that looks unusual is normal, such as lawsuits for a pharma company or store closures for a retailer.
    3. 3.Normalize rather than exclude: include an average annual level of the cost in EBITDA instead of adding all of it back.
    4. 4.Check consistency: whether the company only adds back charges and never deducts one-off gains, and whether the definition of adjusted EBITDA keeps changing.

    The consequence is direct: every dollar wrongly added back is multiplied by the valuation multiple and by the leverage the business is assumed to carry, so recurring "one-time" costs are one of the first things a buyer's diligence team removes.

    Rate yourself:
    Question #3Medium

    Inventory days rose sharply and management calls it strategic. What would you check?

    Whether the build is a real decision with a clear purpose, or a sign of slowing sales and future write-downs.

    What I'd check:

    • •The stated reason: pre-buying ahead of price increases or tariffs, building stock for a launch or season, or securing supply. Each should show up in specific products and should unwind on a predictable timetable.
    • •Composition and aging: which products and locations hold the extra inventory, and how much is old or slow-moving. Inventory concentrated in a few aging lines suggests unsold product.
    • •Sales trends and orders: inventory growing faster than cost of sales while demand is flat is the classic warning sign.
    • •Reserves: whether the inventory reserve kept pace with older stock, or fell as a share of inventory, which would flatter margins.
    • •Cash and margins: the cash tied up, and whether gross margin was helped by absorbing more fixed factory overhead into a larger inventory.

    If the build doesn't reverse, it points to write-downs, lower margins and weaker cash flow ahead, so in diligence it feeds both the working capital peg and the forecast.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    Private Equity Fund Structure: GPs, LPs, Carried Interest

    How private equity funds are structured: GP and LP roles, capital calls, the 2 and 20 fee model, the waterfall, and the metrics LPs use to evaluate returns.

    April 25, 2026

    Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis in Financial Modeling

    How to use sensitivity and scenario analysis in financial models. Learn data tables, tornado charts, base/bull/bear cases, and what to sensitize in DCF, LBO, and merger models.

    March 3, 2026

    Rollover Equity in LBOs: Why PE Firms Use It

    Understand rollover equity in leveraged buyouts. Learn why private equity firms request management rollover, how it affects deal economics, modeling considerations, and tax implications for sellers.

    December 25, 2025

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource