Interview Questions157

    Accounts Receivable and the Allowance for Credit Losses

    Receivables are revenue not yet collected, reported net of expected losses. How the allowance is estimated under CECL and what bankers read from it.

    |
    6 min read
    |
    2 interview questions
    |
    Share
    US GAAPWritten under US GAAP. IFRS treats this topic the same way, so it applies to IFRS reporters too.

    Introduction

    A receivable is revenue a company has earned but not yet collected. The sale has been recorded, the profit recognized and the customer invoiced, but the cash is still outstanding, sometimes for weeks, sometimes for months. Most of it will arrive. Some will not, and the accounts have to estimate how much before anyone knows which customers will fail to pay.

    That estimate is the allowance for credit losses, and it makes receivables one of the most judgment-heavy current assets on the balance sheet. A small change in the allowance moves earnings immediately; a receivables balance growing faster than sales can signal aggressive revenue recognition or a weakening customer base. For a banker, receivables are both a working capital line that absorbs cash as a business grows and a place where reported profits can run ahead of reality.

    How Receivables Arise and Are Measured

    A receivable is recorded when a company has delivered goods or services and has an unconditional right to be paid, which usually coincides with recognizing the revenue under the rules covered in recognition and matching. If revenue has been earned but the right to payment still depends on something other than time, such as completing another part of the contract, the balance is a contract asset rather than a receivable, a distinction explained in contract liabilities and contract assets. And if the work has been done but not yet invoiced, it may appear as an unbilled receivable.

    Trade receivables are measured at amortized cost, essentially the amount billed less amounts collected and written off, and presented net of the allowance for expected credit losses. The balance sheet shows the net figure; the allowance itself is disclosed either in a parenthetical on the face of the balance sheet or in the notes. Where receivables sit among the other current assets is shown in how the balance sheet works.

    The Allowance for Credit Losses

    Since the current expected credit loss (CECL) standard in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 326 replaced the earlier incurred-loss model, companies must estimate the credit losses they expect over the life of their receivables, not only the losses already evident. The estimate draws on historical experience, adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of the future.

    Allowance for credit losses

    A contra-asset that reduces gross receivables to the amount a company expects to collect. Under the CECL model in ASC 326, it reflects expected lifetime credit losses based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable forecasts, and changes in it are recorded as credit loss expense.

    For trade receivables, the most common method is an aging schedule. Deloitte's roadmap on CECL for trade receivables describes the approach: receivables are grouped by how long they have been outstanding, a historical loss rate is applied to each group, and the company assesses whether and how those historical rates differ from what it currently expects. Applied to $1,000 million of receivables:

    Balance sheet
    Estimating the allowance with an aging schedule
    $ in millions; loss rates in %
    Line itemBalanceExpected loss rateAllowance
    Current8000.54
    1 to 30 days past due15046
    31 to 60 days past due25205
    61 to 90 days past due15406
    More than 90 days past due10707
    Gross receivables and allowance1,00028

    Net receivables are 972. Loss rates are illustrative and would be adjusted for current conditions and forecasts, for example raised in a deteriorating economy.

    Two features matter. Even current receivables carry an expected loss, because every receivable that eventually goes bad starts out current. And the oldest buckets dominate the allowance relative to their size: the $10 million more than 90 days overdue requires more allowance than the $800 million that is current.

    Because the model looks forward, the allowance moves with the economy, not only with a company's own collections. If management expects a recession and doubles the loss rates on the three youngest buckets, the allowance rises from $28 million to $43 million, and the $15 million increase is charged to operating income in that quarter, before a single additional customer has defaulted. Banks feel this effect most, but any company with large trade receivables reports some of it.

    Current expected credit loss (CECL) model

    The US GAAP model in ASC 326 that requires companies to recognize an allowance for the credit losses they expect over the full contractual life of financial assets measured at amortized cost, such as trade receivables and loans, using historical data adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

    Credit Loss Expense, Write-Offs and the Roll-Forward

    The allowance moves through three events. When a company increases its estimate, it records credit loss expense, often called bad debt expense, usually within selling, general and administrative costs, which reduces operating income. When a specific receivable is judged uncollectible, it is written off: both the receivable and the allowance fall by the same amount, with no effect on the income statement, because the loss was already expensed through the allowance. When a written-off amount is later collected, it is a recovery, which replenishes the allowance.

    Companies disclose these movements in a roll-forward. Global Industrial's 2024 annual report shows an allowance that began the year at $2.9 million, rose by a $2.1 million provision, fell by $2.2 million of write-offs and ended at $2.8 million, against net receivables of $126.5 million and net sales of about $1.3 billion. The roll-forward is more informative than the closing balance: provisions persistently below write-offs mean the allowance is being drawn down, which flatters earnings until it runs out.

    Tax Treatment of the Allowance

    The tax treatment differs from the books. Under Section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code, a deduction for bad debts is generally allowed only when specific receivables become worthless or are charged off, not when an allowance is built, so a growing allowance creates a temporary difference and a deferred tax asset that reverses as the receivables are written off. For most companies the amounts are small, but for lenders and businesses selling on long credit terms they can be material.

    What Bankers Read Into Receivables

    Bankers look at receivables from three angles.

    Working Capital

    Receivables tie up cash: a company that grows sales by 10% with unchanged payment terms needs roughly 10% more receivables, funded from its own cash. Days sales outstanding (DSO), receivables divided by revenue multiplied by the days in the period, measures how long customers take to pay; Global Industrial's figures imply about 35 days. How DSO is used in forecasting is covered in working capital drivers. Payment terms also differ by customer type: a supplier to large retailers or governments may wait 60 to 90 days, while a business selling to consumers collects almost immediately, so DSO comparisons belong within an industry.

    Earnings Quality

    Receivables growing much faster than revenue can mean looser credit terms to win sales, customers in difficulty, or revenue recognized before it was truly earned, the patterns collected in accounting red flags. Customer concentration matters too: a company whose receivables are owed largely by one or two customers carries risk the allowance may not capture.

    Receivables as a Source of Financing

    Some companies sell receivables to banks or factoring companies, or borrow against them, which converts them into cash early and can lower reported receivables and DSO without any change in how customers pay. Whether such arrangements are true sales or disguised borrowing, and how to adjust for them, is covered in supplier finance and factoring.

    Receivables sit at the intersection of revenue, cash and credit. A banker who reads the aging, the allowance roll-forward and the relationship between receivables and sales together can tell whether reported revenue is turning into cash at the pace it should, and whether the allowance is a prudent estimate or a reserve being drawn down to support earnings.

    Interview Questions

    2
    Question #1Medium

    A company raises its allowance for doubtful accounts by $20 (25% tax; bad debts are deductible only when written off). Walk me through the three statements.

    Net income falls by $15, cash doesn't change, and net receivables fall by $20.

    1. 1.Income statement: $20 of credit loss (bad debt) expense, usually in SG&A, so pre-tax income falls by $20. The expense isn't deductible yet, so current tax is unchanged, but the company records a $5 deferred tax benefit for the future deduction. Net income falls by $15.
    2. 2.Cash flow statement: start with net income down $15, add back the $20 non-cash credit loss expense, and subtract the $5 deferred tax benefit (an increase in deferred tax assets). Cash from operations, and cash, are unchanged.
    3. 3.Balance sheet: net receivables fall by $20 (the allowance grows), deferred tax assets rise by $5, so assets fall by $15; retained earnings fall by $15. It balances.

    When a specific receivable is later written off, the receivable and the allowance fall together with no income statement effect, and that is when the tax deduction arrives and the deferred tax asset reverses.

    Rate yourself:
    Question #2Medium

    Sales grew 5% but receivables grew 10%. Is that a problem, and when could it be fine?

    It deserves questions, but it isn't automatically a problem. Receivables growing faster than sales means customers are taking longer to pay, so DSO is rising and the business is tying up more cash per dollar of sales.

    The worrying explanations:

    • •Looser credit terms to win sales, which pulls revenue forward at the cost of cash.
    • •Customers in difficulty, so collections slow and future write-offs rise.
    • •Aggressive revenue recognition, such as shipping ahead of demand at period end or booking revenue before it is earned.

    The benign ones:

    • •Timing: a large sale late in the period, or a period end that falls before a big collection date, inflates the closing balance without changing collection behavior.
    • •Mix shift: growth with customers who are good credits but have longer standard terms, such as large corporates or governments.
    • •A deliberate, priced decision: extending terms to a strong customer in exchange for volume or price.

    To tell them apart, a banker looks at monthly rather than quarter-end figures, the aging of receivables, the allowance relative to past-due balances, customer concentration, and whether operating cash flow is keeping up with earnings.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    Buybacks vs Dividends: How Companies Return Cash

    Buybacks vs dividends explained: how each returns cash to shareholders, the tax and signaling differences, the EPS effect, and when each makes sense.

    June 25, 2026

    Why Are Investment Banking Bonuses So High?

    Why investment banking bonuses are so high: the revenue-per-head economics, the compensation ratio, why pay is bonus-heavy and cyclical, and the real catch.

    May 27, 2026

    Private Equity Fund Structure: GPs, LPs, Carried Interest

    How private equity funds are structured: GP and LP roles, capital calls, the 2 and 20 fee model, the waterfall, and the metrics LPs use to evaluate returns.

    April 25, 2026

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource