Interview Questions112

    Theme Parks, Ski Resorts and Leisure Venues

    Leisure venue economics: theme park attendance and per caps, ski resort season passes, golf and bowling venues, and how leisure operators are valued and sold.

    |
    7 min read
    |
    1 interview question
    |
    Share

    Introduction

    A theme park, a ski mountain and a golf entertainment venue sell the same thing: a day out. None of them can ship its product or store unused capacity. A ride that runs half empty on a rainy Tuesday earns nothing extra on a sunny Saturday, while the staff, maintenance and debt cost the same. That makes the economics simple to state and hard to manage: revenue is visits multiplied by spending per visit, set against a cost base that barely moves with either. The same logic runs through how cruise lines make money: yields and ship finance, where a ship sells days of leisure from an expensive fixed asset; venues simply stay in one place.

    Six Flags Entertainment Corporation shows the formula at scale. It reported 47.4 million visits in 2025, up from 41.6 million in 2024 after its merger with Cedar Fair, with per capita spending of $61.90 and net revenues of $3.10 billion, according to Six Flags' Form 10-K. This article covers how theme parks, ski resorts and location-based entertainment venues make money, and how leisure operators are valued and sold.

    Theme Parks: Attendance and Per Caps

    Theme park results start with two numbers: how many people came, and how much each one spent. Operators report both, park by park in their internal reporting, because a group's park portfolio mixes large destination parks with smaller regional ones that draw mostly local guests.

    Per Capita Spending

    A theme park's revenue generated inside its parks, including admissions, food and drink, merchandise, games and parking, divided by total attendance. Operators often split it into admissions per capita and in-park spending per capita, because the two respond to different decisions.

    Attendance depends on weather, the length of the operating season, new attractions and pricing. Per capita spending depends on ticket mix and on what guests buy once inside. Six Flags' admissions per capita fell to $33.41 in 2025 from $33.70, while in-park product spending per capita rose to $28.49 from $27.61.

    The season pass trade-off

    That split reflects one of the industry's central choices. Season passes and memberships sell unlimited or frequent visits for a fixed price, often paid before the season starts. They lower the admission revenue per visit but bring guests back many times, and every return visit is another chance to sell food, drinks and upgrades. Six Flags said season pass visits made up a higher share of its 2025 attendance.

    Weather, seasons and new attractions

    Most regional parks in colder climates open for only part of the year, so their results depend on the number of operating days and on weather during peak weeks. Operators extend the season with Halloween and winter holiday events, which add visits at little extra fixed cost but carry their own weather risk. A rainy summer weekend cannot be made up later, which is why bankers compare parks over several seasons rather than one.

    The other big lever is capital spending on new rides and attractions, which give guests a reason to return and support price increases. Parks plan these investments years ahead, and a season without a new attraction can weaken attendance.

    Ski Resorts and the Season Pass Model

    Ski resorts face an even harder version of the same problem: a short season and complete dependence on snow. The industry's answer has been the advance pass, sold months before the season at a discount to buying daily lift tickets.

    Pass Products

    Season passes and multi-day passes that resorts sell before the ski season at a discount to single-day lift ticket prices. Pass products give the resort committed revenue before the weather is known and give the skier a lower cost per day if they ski often.

    Vail Resorts built its business around this model with the Epic Pass, which gives access to a network of resorts. Pass products accounted for about 65% of its total lift revenue in the fiscal year ended July 2025, with sales occurring predominantly before the ski season, according to Vail Resorts' Form 10-K. Lift revenue rose 4.2% to $1.50 billion, and the company reported Resort Reported EBITDA of $844.1 million.

    The pass changes the risk profile of a ski business. Revenue collected in advance protects the resort against a bad snow year, and a multi-resort network lets skiers travel to wherever conditions are best. In exchange, the resort gives up some pricing on the days it would have been busiest, and it depends on pass renewals: a run of poor seasons or price increases that outpace what skiers will pay shows up first in fewer passes sold. Resorts also earn from ancillary spending: ski school, dining, and retail and equipment rental, each a separate revenue line at Vail.

    Location-Based Entertainment: Golf, Bowling and Arcades

    Location-based entertainment covers venues that combine an activity with food and drink: golf entertainment venues with driving bays, bowling centers and arcade-and-restaurant formats. They sit between restaurants and attractions, and their economics follow the same site-level logic as other multi-unit businesses, explained in how multi-unit consumer services businesses work.

    FormatMain revenueKey economics
    Golf entertainmentBay rental, food and drink, corporate eventsLarge, costly sites; high revenue per venue
    Bowling centersLane time, food and drink, partiesOlder sites, often bought and refurbished
    Arcade and diningGame play, food and drinkGame refreshes drive repeat visits

    Food and drink carry these businesses, since they earn higher margins than the activity itself in many formats. Events and parties, from children's birthdays to corporate outings, fill weekday hours that would otherwise be quiet and are often booked weeks ahead. Because new venues are expensive, bankers judge each format on what a site earns against what it costs to build, the measures covered in four-wall EBITDA, new unit returns and payback.

    The boundary with media matters for coverage. Concerts, live events and sports teams belong to media and entertainment coverage, as described in the TMT guide's sports and live entertainment economics; the consumer banker covers venues where the guest pays to visit a site and take part.

    Leisure M&A: Mergers of Equals, Spin-Offs and Sponsors

    Leisure deals take several forms. Mergers of equals combine operators of similar size to gain scale in marketing, pass programs and purchasing. Six Flags and Cedar Fair completed their merger of equals on 1 July 2024, creating a group with 27 amusement parks, 15 separately gated water parks and nine resorts. Deals like this turn on board seats, leadership and the combined company's name as much as on price, issues covered in the blog post on how mergers of equals work.

    Separations and sponsors

    Separations are the second form. A company that owns a leisure business alongside another activity may sell or spin off one of them to let each be valued on its own, especially when the leisure business needs heavy capital spending that the other business does not. Topgolf Callaway Brands sold a 60% stake in its Topgolf and Toptracer businesses to funds managed by Leonard Green & Partners, effective 1 January 2026, in a transaction valuing Topgolf at about $1.1 billion, according to Latham & Watkins, which advised the seller.

    Sponsors are active buyers of leisure venues with steady repeat visits, particularly bowling, family entertainment and ski areas, where an owner can refurbish sites, raise prices and add more locations. Many leisure assets sit on valuable land, so sale-leasebacks often help fund these deals, though the rent then becomes a fixed charge that a bad season must still cover.

    How Bankers Value Leisure Operators

    Leisure operators are valued mainly on enterprise value to EBITDA, adjusted for the capital they must keep spending. A park or resort that needs a new attraction or lift every few years converts less of its EBITDA into free cash flow than its headline margin suggests. Bankers focus on:

    • Attendance and per capita spending, read together, by park or resort
    • Pass and membership mix, and renewal rates before each season
    • Weather and season length, normalized across several years
    • Maintenance and growth capital spending per site
    • Site returns for venue formats, and the cost of new units

    For a coverage banker, these businesses reward the operator that keeps its venues full on ordinary days, not just on the best weekends of the season.

    Interview Questions

    1
    Question #1Easy

    A park draws 10m visits at a $70 per capita spend. A season pass push lifts attendance 10% but cuts per capita spending 5%. What happens to revenue?

    Revenue rises about 4.5%, from $700m to $731.5m.

    • •Before: 10m visits x $70 = $700m.
    • •After: 11m visits x $66.50 ($70 less 5%) = $731.5m.
    • •Change: 1.10 x 0.95 = 1.045, so revenue is up 4.5%, or $31.5m.

    A lower per capita figure is not bad news on its own. Season passes cut admission revenue per visit, since a pass holder's price is spread over many visits, but every return visit is another chance to sell food, drinks and merchandise. So I would split per capita spending into admissions and in-park spending: if in-park spending per visit held and only admissions fell, the push is working.

    Profit rises more than revenue, because staff, maintenance and ride costs barely move with attendance, so most of the $31.5m falls through to EBITDA, less the cost of the extra food and merchandise. Pass revenue is also collected before the season, which protects against bad weather. The risks are pass holders crowding out higher-paying day guests on peak weekends, day-ticket buyers switching to cheaper passes, and weak renewals next season.

    Rate yourself:

    Explore More

    How to Value a Bank: FIG Valuation Explained

    How to value a bank when EV/EBITDA breaks down: master P/TBV, ROE, the justified P/B formula, and the dividend discount model for FIG interviews.

    July 20, 2026

    Buybacks vs Dividends: How Companies Return Cash

    Buybacks vs dividends explained: how each returns cash to shareholders, the tax and signaling differences, the EPS effect, and when each makes sense.

    June 25, 2026

    Why Are Investment Banking Bonuses So High?

    Why investment banking bonuses are so high: the revenue-per-head economics, the compensation ratio, why pay is bonus-heavy and cyclical, and the real catch.

    May 27, 2026

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 5,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 10,000+ students who have downloaded this resource