Equity Research vs Investment Banking: Key Differences

Understanding the Two Career Paths

Equity research and investment banking both sit within investment banks and involve analyzing companies, but they serve fundamentally different purposes and offer distinct career experiences. Understanding these differences helps you choose the path that aligns with your interests, skills, and lifestyle preferences.

Investment banking focuses on helping companies execute transactions. Bankers advise clients on mergers and acquisitions, raise capital through debt and equity offerings, and provide strategic advisory services. The work is project-based and driven by deal timelines.

Equity research focuses on analyzing publicly traded stocks and making investment recommendations to institutional investors. Research analysts study companies, build financial models, publish research reports, and communicate their views to portfolio managers and traders.

Both roles require strong analytical skills and financial knowledge, but they attract different personality types and lead to different career trajectories.

Core Job Functions Compared

The daily work in each role differs significantly despite surface similarities in analyzing companies.

Investment Banking Day-to-Day

Investment bankers spend their time on client deliverables tied to active deals and potential transactions. The work includes building financial models, creating presentation materials, conducting due diligence, and coordinating transaction processes.

Pitch books present ideas for potential transactions to prospective clients. These materials require research on companies and industries, comparable transaction analysis, and preliminary valuation work.

Financial modeling for deals includes DCF analysis, merger models, LBO models, and various valuation methodologies. Models support client decision-making and transaction structuring.

Transaction execution involves managing workstreams across multiple parties including lawyers, accountants, and company management. Bankers coordinate diligence, negotiate terms, and drive deals toward closing.

The work is reactive to client needs and deal developments. Priorities shift rapidly based on transaction dynamics and client requests.

Equity Research Day-to-Day

Research analysts maintain continuous coverage of assigned companies, typically ten to twenty names depending on the sector and firm. The work revolves around understanding businesses deeply and forming investment views.

Financial modeling for coverage companies projects future performance based on industry analysis, competitive dynamics, and company-specific factors. Models inform price targets and investment recommendations.

Research reports communicate analysis and recommendations to investors. Reports range from brief notes on quarterly earnings to comprehensive initiation pieces covering business models, competitive positions, and valuation.

Client communication involves speaking with portfolio managers, responding to investor questions, and presenting views at conferences and meetings. Building relationships with buy-side investors is essential.

The work is more self-directed than banking, with analysts setting their own research priorities within coverage responsibilities.

Compensation Comparison

Both paths offer strong compensation relative to most careers, but banking typically pays more at junior levels with the gap potentially narrowing at senior levels.

Entry-Level Compensation

First-year investment banking analysts at major banks earn base salaries around $110,000 to $120,000 plus year-end bonuses that can reach $100,000 or more depending on performance and firm profitability. Total compensation in the first year often exceeds $200,000.

First-year equity research associates typically earn base salaries around $100,000 to $115,000 plus bonuses that range from $30,000 to $80,000 depending on the firm and individual performance. Total compensation often falls between $130,000 and $200,000.

The gap reflects the market rate for banking hours and the revenue bankers generate directly through deal fees.

Career Progression and Senior Compensation

Banking compensation continues increasing through associate and vice president levels before reaching significant variability at senior ranks. Managing directors with strong deal flow can earn $1 million to several million annually, but outcomes vary widely.

Research compensation follows a different trajectory. Senior analysts who achieve Institutional Investor rankings and generate significant trading commissions can earn substantial amounts, sometimes exceeding $1 million annually. However, fewer research roles reach these levels compared to banking.

Research offers more compensation stability since it is less tied to deal timing, but banking offers higher upside for strong performers.

Practice articulating your career goals: Download our iOS app to rehearse questions about why you are pursuing specific finance paths.

Lifestyle and Hours

The lifestyle difference between research and banking is one of the starkest contrasts between the two paths.

Investment Banking Hours

Banking hours are notoriously demanding, particularly at junior levels. Analysts and associates commonly work 80 to 100 hours per week during busy periods, with work extending into nights and weekends based on deal demands.

The work is unpredictable. Deals do not respect personal schedules, and client requests arrive whenever they arrive. Late nights are common, and all-nighters occur during critical deal phases.

Work-life balance improves somewhat at senior levels as bankers gain more control over their schedules, but the culture remains demanding throughout.

Equity Research Hours

Research offers significantly better hours and more predictable schedules. Analysts typically work 50 to 70 hours per week with less variance than banking.

Earnings seasons create temporary intensity as analysts update models and publish notes for multiple coverage companies in compressed timeframes. Conference attendance and marketing trips add travel requirements.

Outside of earnings and major company events, schedules are more manageable. Analysts have greater control over their daily priorities and face fewer urgent requests from external parties.

Quality of Life Implications

The hours difference affects everything from relationships to health to personal interests. Banking hours make maintaining outside commitments difficult, while research allows for more normal life activities.

Some people thrive in intense environments and find banking hours acceptable given the compensation and experience. Others prioritize lifestyle flexibility and find research more sustainable.

Skills and Personality Fit

Each path rewards different skills and attracts different personality types.

Skills for Investment Banking

Banking rewards project management and execution skills. Deals involve coordinating multiple workstreams, managing competing demands, and driving processes forward under time pressure.

Client service orientation matters because bankers respond to client needs and manage expectations throughout transactions. Strong interpersonal skills help in client interactions and team collaboration.

Attention to detail under pressure is essential since errors in deal documents have real consequences. Bankers must maintain accuracy while working quickly on multiple projects.

Stamina and resilience help manage the demanding hours and intense periods that characterize banking work.

Skills for Equity Research

Research rewards intellectual curiosity and analytical depth. Successful analysts enjoy diving deep into industries and companies to understand what drives business performance.

Writing and communication skills matter significantly since research analysts produce written reports and must explain complex analysis clearly. The job involves substantial writing that banking does not.

Independent thinking helps analysts develop differentiated views that add value for investors. Following consensus does not generate trading commissions or build reputation.

Long-term relationship building with buy-side clients supports career success. Investors rely on analysts they trust for insights and access.

Personality Considerations

People who enjoy deal execution, thrive under pressure, and prioritize compensation often prefer banking. Those who prefer deeper analysis, value lifestyle, and enjoy writing often gravitate toward research.

Neither preference is superior. Understanding your own priorities helps identify which path will prove more satisfying long-term.

Exit Opportunities Compared

Career paths after each role differ significantly, which affects long-term optionality.

Investment Banking Exits

Banking provides extensive exit opportunities, which partially explains its popularity despite demanding hours. Common exits include:

Private equity firms recruit heavily from investment banking, particularly for associate and pre-MBA roles. Banking provides deal experience and modeling skills that PE values.

Hedge funds hire bankers for event-driven and special situations strategies that benefit from transaction experience.

Corporate development roles at companies value banking backgrounds for M&A evaluation and execution capabilities.

Venture capital increasingly recruits from banking for roles involving financial analysis and deal evaluation.

The breadth of options makes banking attractive for candidates uncertain about their long-term direction.

Equity Research Exits

Research exit opportunities are more focused around the buy-side investing path:

Buy-side research at asset managers and hedge funds represents the most common exit. The transition is natural since the work is similar.

Portfolio management can follow from strong research careers, though this path is competitive and depends on performance.

Corporate investor relations values research background for communicating with analysts and investors.

Sell-side trading sometimes attracts research professionals who want to stay in capital markets.

Research exits are narrower than banking exits, which represents a real consideration for candidates weighing options.

Recruiting and Breaking In

The paths into each role differ in timing and structure.

Investment Banking Recruiting

Banking recruiting is highly structured with defined timelines, particularly for summer analyst and full-time analyst positions at major banks. Networking plays a significant role in accessing opportunities.

Competition is intense, with candidates from target schools having advantages in on-campus recruiting. Non-target candidates can succeed but must work harder to access interviews.

Interviews test technical knowledge alongside behavioral fit. Preparation is essential given the standardized nature of recruiting.

Equity Research Recruiting

Research recruiting is less structured than banking, with more variation in timing and process across firms. Some firms recruit through formal programs while others hire opportunistically.

Breaking into research often requires demonstrating genuine interest in stocks and analysis. Publishing investment write-ups or participating in stock pitch competitions helps candidates stand out.

Interviews focus more on stock pitches and investment ideas than pure technical questions. Demonstrating you can analyze companies and form views matters more than textbook knowledge.

Get comprehensive interview preparation: Download our complete interview guide covering both banking and research interview formats.

Industry and Sector Considerations

Both paths offer sector specialization, but the nature of that specialization differs.

Banking Industry Groups

Investment banks organize coverage groups by industry including technology, healthcare, consumer, industrials, financial institutions, and others. Bankers develop expertise in their coverage sectors through repeated exposure to deals and companies.

Specialization depth varies by bank size and structure. Large banks have narrow industry groups while smaller banks may cover broader sectors.

Research Coverage

Research analysts cover specific stocks within sectors, developing deep expertise in assigned companies. Coverage portfolios typically include ten to twenty companies depending on the sector.

Analysts become experts on their companies, knowing management teams, competitive dynamics, and business drivers intimately. This depth exceeds what bankers typically develop since research requires continuous coverage rather than project-based involvement.

Making Your Decision

Several factors should inform your choice between research and banking.

Choose Banking If You

Prioritize compensation and are willing to work demanding hours in exchange for higher pay and broader exit opportunities.

Enjoy deal execution and find satisfaction in driving transactions to completion under pressure.

Value optionality and want to keep multiple career paths open after your initial experience.

Thrive in intensity and perform well in high-pressure, time-sensitive environments.

Choose Research If You

Prioritize lifestyle and value having more predictable hours and personal time.

Love fundamental analysis and enjoy understanding businesses deeply rather than executing transactions.

Want to invest and see research as preparation for buy-side investing careers.

Enjoy writing and communication and want a role where expressing ideas clearly matters significantly.

Questions to Ask Yourself

What energizes you more: closing a deal after months of work, or publishing analysis that changes how investors think about a company?

How important is work-life balance to you at this career stage?

Are you certain about wanting to invest long-term, or do you want to explore options?

How do you perform under unpredictable, intense time pressure?

Key Takeaways

Conclusion

Equity research and investment banking both offer compelling career paths within finance, but they suit different people. Banking provides higher compensation, broader exits, and deal execution experience at the cost of demanding hours. Research offers deeper analysis, better lifestyle, and a clearer path to investing careers.

Neither path is objectively better. The right choice depends on your priorities, personality, and long-term goals. Understanding these differences helps you make an informed decision rather than defaulting to whatever opportunity appears first.

Once you decide on your path, prepare thoroughly for recruiting. Our guide on why investment banking helps you articulate your motivation whether you choose banking or need to explain why you considered alternatives.