Interview Questions152

    Biotech Capital Markets: IPOs, Follow-Ons, PIPEs, and Convertibles

    The full toolkit. IPO windows (highly cyclical), crossover rounds, PIPEs (87% of 2025 follow-ons), ATM programs, convertible debt (record $7.37B in 2025), and non-dilutive alternatives.

    |
    8 min read
    |
    2 interview questions
    |

    Introduction

    Clinical-stage biotech companies burn cash for years before generating revenue, which means their survival depends entirely on the capital markets. A biotech that cannot raise equity capital must either find a partner, sell the company, or shut down. This makes capital markets strategy one of the most important functions in biotech management, and biotech equity offerings one of the highest-volume product areas in healthcare banking. The healthcare ECM (equity capital markets) desk at a major bank may execute 50-100+ biotech transactions per year across IPOs, follow-ons, PIPEs, and convertibles.

    The Biotech IPO Market

    Biotech IPOs are among the most cyclical capital markets products in investment banking. IPO windows open during bull markets (2020-2021 saw record biotech IPO volume with 100+ biotechs going public) and effectively close during bear markets (2022 saw IPO activity drop by 75%+, with many companies postponing or canceling their offerings entirely). This cyclicality creates a unique dynamic: companies founded during bull markets may not be able to go public until the next window opens, potentially years later, forcing reliance on private capital that is more expensive and dilutive.

    FactorImpact on Biotech IPO Market
    XBI (Biotech ETF) performanceStrong correlation with IPO window openness
    Interest ratesHigher rates reduce risk appetite for pre-revenue companies
    Clinical data cyclePositive readouts from public biotechs improve sentiment
    Pharma M&A activityActive M&A signals exit potential, encouraging new company formation
    Post-IPO trading performanceRecent IPOs trading above issue price encourages new issuance
    Crossover Round

    A late-stage private financing round (typically Series B or C) that includes both venture capital investors and public market investors (mutual funds, hedge funds). Crossover rounds signal IPO readiness because the participation of public market investors validates the company's story for a public audience and builds a "book" of institutional investors who will participate in the IPO. They also provide price discovery: the crossover round valuation often serves as a reference point for IPO pricing. Companies that complete crossover rounds typically price their IPOs within 3-6 months. The crossover round has become essentially a prerequisite for biotech IPOs; companies that attempt to go public without crossover investor participation face significantly higher execution risk.

    Typical Biotech IPO Economics

    A typical biotech IPO raises $150-300 million at a valuation of $500M-1.5 billion (post-money). The underwriter discount is 7% for offerings under $250 million and 5-6% for larger offerings. The lock-up period (during which insiders cannot sell shares) is typically 180 days. The proceeds are expected to fund the company's pipeline through one or two major catalyst events (typically 18-24 months of cash runway), giving the company time to generate data that either supports a follow-on offering at a higher price or attracts an acquirer.

    Follow-On Offerings and PIPEs

    Post-IPO, biotechs raise additional equity through several mechanisms, each with distinct advantages and trade-offs:

    Public follow-on offerings are traditional registered secondary offerings marketed to institutional investors over 1-2 days. They provide the largest capital raises (typically $200-500 million+) but require favorable market windows and involve underwriter fees (typically 3-5%). The "overnight" follow-on (priced after market close and settled within 48 hours) has become the standard format, minimizing the market risk of a multi-day marketing period.

    PIPEs (Private Investment in Public Equity) have become the dominant biotech follow-on vehicle. In PIPEs, the company sells shares directly to a small group of institutional investors (typically 3-10 investors) at a negotiated price (typically at a discount to market). PIPEs are faster (can close in days rather than weeks), have lower transaction costs, and can be executed regardless of market conditions because the investors have already committed before the deal is announced.

    ATM (at-the-market) programs allow the company to sell shares into the open market over time at prevailing market prices, rather than in a single large transaction. ATMs minimize market impact and allow the company to raise capital opportunistically (selling more when the stock is high, less when it is low). However, ATMs are limited in the amount that can be raised (typically 5-15% of market cap over the life of the program) and signal ongoing dilution to the market, which can create a persistent drag on the stock price.

    Shelf Registration (S-3)

    A type of SEC registration that allows a public company to register securities in advance and issue them at any time over a three-year period without filing a new registration statement. Biotech companies maintain active shelf registrations so they can raise capital quickly when the window opens. Without a shelf, filing a new registration statement takes weeks and requires SEC review, potentially causing the company to miss a favorable market window. To file an S-3, the company must have been public for at least 12 months and meet minimum public float requirements. Companies that cannot use an S-3 (typically recent IPOs or micro-cap biotechs) must use an S-1, which is slower and more expensive.

    Convertible Notes

    Convertible notes have surged in biotech, reaching a record $7.37 billion in 2025. These instruments provide debt-like financing (interest payments, maturity date) with equity conversion features (convert to stock at a predetermined price). Convertibles are primarily used by commercial-stage biotechs that have some revenue to service the interest payments and want to minimize equity dilution while maintaining financial flexibility.

    Non-Dilutive Funding

    Biotechs also access non-dilutive capital sources that do not require issuing equity, preserving shareholder value:

    • [Licensing deal upfronts](/guides/healthcare-investment-banking/biotech-partnering-licensing): Out-licensing programs to pharma partners generates immediate cash through upfront payments, often $50-300 million for late-stage assets
    • Government grants: NIH, BARDA, and other agencies fund early-stage research, particularly in infectious disease, rare disease, and national security areas. BARDA funding can reach $1 billion+ for pandemic preparedness programs
    • Royalty monetization: Companies with future royalty streams can sell those streams to royalty aggregators (Royalty Pharma, OMERS) for immediate capital, effectively converting uncertain future cash flows into certain present cash
    • Priority Review Vouchers (PRVs): Biotechs that receive FDA approval for neglected tropical disease or rare pediatric disease products receive a PRV that can be sold for $80-150 million to other companies seeking expedited FDA review for their own drugs

    The next article covers how biotech companies get acquired, which is the most common exit path for successful biotechs.

    Interview Questions

    2
    Interview Question #1Medium

    What is a PIPE and why are they common in biotech?

    A PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity) is a transaction where a publicly traded company sells shares (common stock, preferred stock, or convertible notes) directly to a select group of institutional investors, bypassing the public markets.

    PIPEs are common in biotech for several reasons:

    1. Speed. A PIPE can close in 1-2 weeks, versus 4-6 weeks for a public follow-on offering. For a biotech that needs cash quickly (e.g., to fund a trial after positive data), speed is critical.

    2. Market conditions. When biotech stocks are depressed or volatile (making public offerings risky/dilutive), PIPEs offer a guaranteed capital raise at a negotiated price, typically a 5-15% discount to market.

    3. Confidentiality. PIPEs are negotiated privately before announcement, avoiding the stock price drop that often occurs when a public offering is announced.

    4. Smaller raise sizes. PIPEs are practical for raises of $20-200M, which is common for single-trial funding. Public offerings have higher fixed costs that make smaller raises less efficient.

    5. Investor quality. PIPEs attract specialized healthcare investors who understand the science and provide more stable, knowledgeable ownership.

    The trade-off: PIPE investors demand a discount and sometimes structural protections (warrants, registration rights) that can be more dilutive per dollar raised than a well-executed public offering.

    Interview Question #2Medium

    A biotech has $600M in cash with quarterly operating expenses of $45M, growing 10% annually. Approximately how many quarters of runway does it have, and why does this matter?

    At the current burn rate without growth: $600M / $45M = 13.3 quarters (~3.3 years).

    With 10% annual cost growth (~2.5% per quarter), expenses escalate: - Q1-Q4: $45M, $46.1M, $47.3M, $48.5M (Year 1 total: ~$187M, remaining: ~$413M) - Q5-Q8: $49.7M, $50.9M, $52.2M, $53.5M (Year 2 total: ~$206M, remaining: ~$207M) - Q9-Q12: $54.8M, $56.2M... (exhausted mid-Year 3)

    Actual runway: approximately 11-12 quarters (~3 years), shorter than the naive 13.3 quarter estimate.

    Why it matters:

    1. Financing timeline. A biotech typically needs to raise capital when it has 12-18 months of runway remaining, to allow time for financing logistics. With ~3 years of runway, this company has roughly 18 months before it must initiate a raise.

    2. Valuation impact. Investors discount biotechs trading near financing cliffs. A company with <12 months of cash often trades at a steep discount because the upcoming dilutive raise depresses per-share value.

    3. Negotiating leverage. A biotech with ample cash can negotiate better terms with potential partners or acquirers. One running low on cash is in a weak negotiating position.

    Explore More

    IB Pitch Book Structure: Section-by-Section Breakdown

    What goes in each section of an investment banking pitch book and why. Covers situation overview, valuation, transaction structure, and how to discuss pitch books in interviews.

    November 2, 2025

    Investment Banking to Private Equity: Timeline and Positioning

    Master the IB to PE recruiting timeline. Learn when on-cycle recruiting starts, how to work with headhunters, and position yourself for top private equity offers.

    December 8, 2025

    PIK Interest and Payment-in-Kind Debt Explained

    Understand PIK interest and payment-in-kind debt structures used in leveraged finance and private credit. Learn how PIK works, when it is used, and how to model PIK in LBO transactions.

    December 23, 2025

    Ready to Transform Your Interview Prep?

    Join 3,000+ students preparing smarter

    Join 3,000+ students who have downloaded this resource